This is just something I noticed, and I wonder why. Anyone know?
I set up Pi-hole and unbound containers, giving them IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. Pi-hole was installed following the wiki (plus the IPv6 address, see below); unbound was just a case of setting its interface/addresses and pulling the image.
Using them with IPv4 works perfectly.
IPv6 however doesn't, unless I also add the IPv6 addresses to the containers' interfaces in the /IPv6/address section. I didn't need to do that for IPv4 and /ip/address/print does not show them, as expected.
Without the above I can't even ping the containers' IPv6 addresses.
Just curious... why the difference?
My Pi-hole->unbound DNS is working nicely on both IPv4 and IPv6 now... I love my new RB5009
And yes, I know I technically don't need both IPv4 and IPv6 DNS, but since when does 'need' have anything to do with it?![Laughing :lol:]()
I set up Pi-hole and unbound containers, giving them IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. Pi-hole was installed following the wiki (plus the IPv6 address, see below); unbound was just a case of setting its interface/addresses and pulling the image.
Code:
# Config line for the Pihole for both IPv4 and IPv6/interface/veth/add address=192.168.1.46/24,[redacted]::46/64 gateway=192.168.1.254 gateway6=[redacted]::254 name=vethPihole
IPv6 however doesn't, unless I also add the IPv6 addresses to the containers' interfaces in the /IPv6/address section. I didn't need to do that for IPv4 and /ip/address/print does not show them, as expected.
Without the above I can't even ping the containers' IPv6 addresses.
Just curious... why the difference?
My Pi-hole->unbound DNS is working nicely on both IPv4 and IPv6 now... I love my new RB5009

And yes, I know I technically don't need both IPv4 and IPv6 DNS, but since when does 'need' have anything to do with it?

Statistics: Posted by SpartanX — Mon Mar 10, 2025 4:18 am