Hi,
For those who are interested, since the issue of including the WAN port in the same bridge is discussed (although I don't know if it is in this topic).
Ask support about vlan configuration on L009 and RB5009:
Support response:
Regards,
For those who are interested, since the issue of including the WAN port in the same bridge is discussed (although I don't know if it is in this topic).
Ask support about vlan configuration on L009 and RB5009:
Code:
Both the RB5009 and L009 block diagram shows that the SFP port plugs directly into the integrated marvell switch.To get full performance, should the SFP port be used as a WAN on the bridge? Or should a layer 3 vlan be created on the SFP and not included in the bridge?The internet is received from the ISP in vlan20.So this is the right thing to do? Setting 1:/interface bridgeadd frame-types=admit-only-vlan-tagged name=BDI100 port-cost-mode=short protocol-mode=none pvid=99 vlan-filtering=yes/interface bridge portadd bridge=BDI100 comment=PC01 frame-types=admit-only-untagged-and-priority-tagged interface=ether1 pvid=2...add bridge=BDI100 comment=WAN frame-types=admit-only-vlan-tagged interface=sfp1 pvid=20 --> WAN PORT/interface bridge vlanadd bridge=BDI100 tagged=BDI100,sfp1 vlan-ids=20 --> WAN VLAN ISPOr this other? Setting 2:/interface vlanadd interface=sfp1 name=vlan20 vlan-id=20// Not included SFP on bridge with LAN portsThanksRegards,Code:
Hello,Thank you for contacting MikroTik Support. In terms of performance, both setups should offer similar throughput since they both involve VLAN tagging and handling. However, if you anticipate heavy WAN traffic or specific QoS requirements, you might need to test both setups to determine which one performs better in your environment.Best regards,Regards,
Statistics: Posted by wispmikrotik — Tue Feb 27, 2024 5:36 pm