Hi everyone,
just started to support a small company with RB2011UiAS-Rm as main router and the problem is - very slow internet speed. I am not very experinced with mikrotik, but what i've seen so far is this:
The router is running ROS 7.18.2, internet is via sfp1 port - 1G full duplex.
3 unifi access points attached to 3 of the gigabit ports and 2 workstations attached with gigabit switch to the 4-th port. Workstations are running 54 vm on hyper-v.
In the router are configured 10 wan ip addresses on sfp1, 11 nat rules (src-nat -> netmap) - vm's must use specific wan ip
Also - 46 wireguard peers, 5-6 l2tp vpn accounts.
The result is 100% cpu load, and very slow internet speed.
question 1: i think a good decision to upgrade will be Mikrotik RB5009UPr+S+IN, or Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+, but i am not sure which one is the better option.
question 2: is there a way to reduce the cpu load until the router is replaced.
Cheers
just started to support a small company with RB2011UiAS-Rm as main router and the problem is - very slow internet speed. I am not very experinced with mikrotik, but what i've seen so far is this:
The router is running ROS 7.18.2, internet is via sfp1 port - 1G full duplex.
3 unifi access points attached to 3 of the gigabit ports and 2 workstations attached with gigabit switch to the 4-th port. Workstations are running 54 vm on hyper-v.
In the router are configured 10 wan ip addresses on sfp1, 11 nat rules (src-nat -> netmap) - vm's must use specific wan ip
Also - 46 wireguard peers, 5-6 l2tp vpn accounts.
The result is 100% cpu load, and very slow internet speed.
question 1: i think a good decision to upgrade will be Mikrotik RB5009UPr+S+IN, or Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+, but i am not sure which one is the better option.
question 2: is there a way to reduce the cpu load until the router is replaced.
Cheers
Statistics: Posted by gmaslarov — Fri Mar 28, 2025 8:46 pm