Does having fq codel on queue interface with fasttrack firewall rule works?
I've tried using PCQ Queue tree and CAKE diffserve4 in simple Queue, but I'm not confident that my mangle rules works properly.
That why I've resorted to the simplest QoS method.
When I'm using CAKE, my cpu usage sometime spike to 60%-70% under speed test. While fq codel+fasttrack it barely reaches 20%.
I've tried using PCQ Queue tree and CAKE diffserve4 in simple Queue, but I'm not confident that my mangle rules works properly.
That why I've resorted to the simplest QoS method.
Code:
/queue typename="FQ-Codel" kind=fq-codel fq-codel-limit=10240 fq-codel-interval=100ms fq-codel-target=5ms fq-codel-ecn=yes fq-codel-flows=1024 fq-codel-memlimit=32.0MiB fq-codel-quantum=1514/queue interface# INTERFACE QUEUE ACTIVE-QUEUE0 ether1 FQ-Codel FQ-Codel 1 ether2 FQ-Codel FQ-Codel /ip firewall filter 1 chain=input action=accept connection-state=established,related 2 chain=input action=drop connection-state=invalid 3 chain=input action=accept protocol=icmp 4 ;;; Allow LAN users to router chain=input action=accept in-interface-list=LAN 5 ;;; Drop all else chain=input action=drop 6 chain=forward action=fasttrack-connection hw-offload=yes connection-state=established,related 7 chain=forward action=accept connection-state=established,related,untracked 8 chain=forward action=drop connection-state=invalid log=no log-prefix="" 9 ;;; Allow internet traffic from LAN chain=forward action=accept in-interface-list=LAN out-interface-list=WAN 10 ;;; Drop all else chain=forward action=drop# INTERFACE BRIDGE HW PVID PRIORITY PATH-COST INTERNAL-PATH-COST HORIZON0 wlan2 Bridge 1 0x80 20 10 none 1 ether2 Bridge yes 1 0x80 10 10 noneStatistics: Posted by naks — Thu Mar 06, 2025 6:00 am