Quantcast
Channel: MikroTik
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 23620

Wireless Networking • Re: Ce+eC vs Ce+Ce on overlapping channels

$
0
0
Btw, in my country channel 32 (5150 to 5170) is legal. I'd appreciate it if mikrotik added support for channel 32, as well as channels 68 and 96. It'd give mikrotik an edge in crowded places.
In Singapore as well. Channel 32 (5150-5170) is non-DFS. Channels 68 (5330-5350) and 96 (5470-5490) are DFS channels. It'd be great to have them in the tool bag. Here's Singapore's entry from db.txt in the Linux wireless-regdb:
Code:
country SG: DFS-FCC(2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW)(5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), AUTO-BW(5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), DFS, AUTO-BW        # This range ends at 5725 MHz, but channel 144 extends to 5730 MHz.        # Since 5725 ~ 5730 MHz belongs to the next range which has looser        # requirements, we can extend the range by 5 MHz to make the kernel        # happy and be able to use channel 144.(5470 - 5730 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS(5725 - 5850 @ 80), (1000 mW)(5945 - 6425 @ 320), (250 mW), NO-OUTDOOR(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (10000 mW)
And here's the reg-info readout from RouterOS 7.16.2 on a hAP ac3:
Code:
country: Singaporenumber: 0  ranges: 2402-2482/20          5490-5730/24/dfs          5735-5835/30          5250-5330/24/dfs          5170-5250/24
As you can see, Channels 32, 68, and 96 are missing in RouterOS, but they're allowed in Linux's wireless-regdb.

Have you received any feedback from MikroTik development about this request?

Statistics: Posted by BBCWatcher — Sun Jan 19, 2025 12:45 am



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 23620

Trending Articles